More shadows than lights in political parties’ human rights commitments

āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ āļ— āđ€āļĨāļ‚āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ āļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆ āļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļ°

JQ1749.A15 I612 2019 c.1

āļĄāļļāļĄāļŦāļ™āļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āļ­āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ› āļšāļ™āļŠāļąāđ‰āļ™ āļ‚āļ­āļĒāļ·āļĄ

JQ1749.A15 I612 2019 c.2

āļĄāļļāļĄāļŦāļ™āļąāļ‡āļŠāļ·āļ­āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ› āļšāļ™āļŠāļąāđ‰āļ™ āļ‚āļ­āļĒāļ·āļĄ
āđ€āļĨāļ‚āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ
JQ1749.A15 I612 2019
āļœāļđāđ‰āđāļ•āđˆāļ‡āļ™āļīāļ•āļīāļšāļļāļ„āļ„āļĨ
āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡
More shadows than lights in political parties’ human rights commitments / International Federation for Human Rights
āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāđāļ•āļāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡
āđ€āļ‡āļēāļĄāļ·āļ”āļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļēāđāļŠāļ‡āļŠāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡ āļžāļĢāļĢāļ„āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ„āļ—āļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āļāļīāļˆāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļĄāļ™āļļāļĐāļĒāļŠāļ™
āļžāļīāļĄāļžāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āđŒ
Bangkok : International Federation for Human Rights, 2019.
āļĢāļđāļ›āđ€āļĨāđˆāļĄ
30 p. : ill. ; 30 cm.
āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļŠāļēāļĢāļšāļąāļ
Executive summary
--Background: junta at the helm amid tightly controlled election environment
--Survey findings: more shadows than lights
--Lights: human rights defenders, refugees, detention conditions
--Shadows: freedom of expression, role of the military, women’s rights, the death penalty, and impunity for human rights violations
--Recommendations to elected members of parliament.
āļšāļ—āļ„āļąāļ”āļĒāđˆāļ­
The report is based on the findings of a survey conducted by FIDH among 32 Thai political parties. The survey revealed that, despite some positive commitments regarding human rights defenders, detention conditions, and refugees and asylum seekers, political parties were reluctant to address some of the most critical issues impacting human rights and democratic principles in Thailand. The survey found little support from political parties for measures aimed at improving the enjoyment of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. Only a small minority favored the amendment of criminal defamation laws, while the overwhelming majority did not support the removal of jail terms for violators of Article 112 of the Criminal Code (lèse-majesté). Disappointingly, the majority of political parties expressed strong support for the death penalty. As Thailand remains mired in a culture of deeply entrenched impunity, it was equally discouraging to note the political parties’ lack of enthusiasm for impartial investigations into allegations of serious human rights violations, including in Thailand’s ‘Deep South.’ The survey also revealed reluctance to limit the role of the military in Thailand’s political affairs. Less than half of the parties surveyed said they would significantly reduce the military’s budget, and only a few parties saw security sector reform as a main priority for the next government. On a more positive note, the survey showed that the majority of the parties support legislation that incorporates the principle of non-refoulement for refugees and asylum seekers. Half of the political parties favored adopting concrete measure to address Thailand’s abysmal prison conditions by incorporating provisions of international standards related to the treatment of prisoners into domestic legislation. The survey also highlighted the political parties’ support for regular engagement with human rights defenders. The numerous recommendations contained in the report provide a clear agenda for parliamentary action to concretely address Thailand’s key human rights issues after the election.
āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāđāļŦāļĨāđˆāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļē
With the compliments of Mrs. Angkhana Neelapaijit
āļŦāļąāļ§āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡
āļŦāļąāļ§āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡
āļŦāļąāļ§āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡
āļ„āļģāļĻāļąāļžāļ—āđŒ
āļœāļđāđ‰āđāļ•āđˆāļ‡āļ™āļīāļ•āļīāļšāļļāļ„āļ„āļĨ
āļœāļđāđ‰āđāļ•āđˆāļ‡āļ™āļīāļ•āļīāļšāļļāļ„āļ„āļĨ
āđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĄāđ‚āļĒāļ‡
āđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĄāđ‚āļĒāļ‡
LEADER : 00000nab 2200000uu 4500
008   190319s2019||||th 000 0 eng d
050 00^aJQ1749.A15^bI612 2019
110 1 ^aInternational Federation for Human Rights
245 00^aMore shadows than lights in political parties’ human rights commitments /^cInternational Federation for Human Rights
246 30^aāđ€āļ‡āļēāļĄāļ·āļ”āļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļēāđāļŠāļ‡āļŠāļ§āđˆāļēāāļžāļĢāļĢāļ„āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ„āļ—āļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āļāļīāļˆāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļĄāļ™āļļāļĐāļĒāļŠāļ™
260   ^aBangkok :^bInternational Federation for Human Rights, ^c2019.
300   ^a30 p. :^bill. ^c30 cm.
505 0 ^aExecutive summary --^tBackground: junta at the helm amid tightly controlled election environment --^tSurvey findings: more shadows than lights --^tLights: human rights defenders, refugees, detention conditions --^tShadows: freedom of expression, role of the military, women’s rights, the death penalty, and impunity for human rights violations --^tRecommendations to elected members of parliament.
520   ^aThe report is based on the findings of a survey conducted by FIDH among 32 Thai political parties. The survey revealed that, despite some positive commitments regarding human rights defenders, detention conditions, and refugees and asylum seekers, political parties were reluctant to address some of the most critical issues impacting human rights and democratic principles in Thailand.  The survey found little support from political parties for measures aimed at improving the enjoyment of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. Only a small minority favored the amendment of criminal defamation laws, while the overwhelming majority did not support the removal of jail terms for violators of Article 112 of the Criminal Code (lèse-majesté). Disappointingly, the majority of political parties expressed strong support for the death penalty. As Thailand remains mired in a culture of deeply entrenched impunity, it was equally discouraging to note the political parties’ lack of enthusiasm for impartial investigations into allegations of serious human rights violations, including in Thailand’s Â‘Deep South.’  The survey also revealed reluctance to limit the role of the military in Thailand’s political affairs. Less than half of the parties surveyed said they would significantly reduce the military’s budget, and only a few parties saw security sector reform as a main priority for the next government.  On a more positive note, the survey showed that the majority of the parties support legislation that incorporates the principle of non-refoulement for refugees and asylum seekers. Half of the political parties favored adopting concrete measure to address Thailand’s abysmal prison conditions by incorporating provisions of international standards related to the treatment of prisoners into domestic legislation. The survey also highlighted the political parties’ support for regular engagement with human rights defenders.  The numerous recommendations contained in the report provide a clear agenda for parliamentary action to concretely address Thailand’s key human rights issues after the election.
536   ^aWith the compliments of Mrs. Angkhana Neelapaijit
650  4^aHuman Rights^zThailand  
650  4^aPolitical parties^zThailand  
650  4^aCivil rights^zThailand
653   ^aNew Arrivals 04-2019
710 1 ^aāļŠāļĄāļēāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āđŒāļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļĄāļ™āļļāļĐāļĒāļŠāļ™āļŠāļēāļāļĨ
710 1 ^aFIDH
856 40^zFull text^uhttps://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/thailande731aweb.pdf
856 40^3Content^uhttp://library.nhrc.or.th/ulib/document/Content/T10500.pdf
917   ^aGift :^c200
955   ^a2 copies
999   ^anopparat
āđ€āļĨāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļšāļ™